Facebook fan pages vs (forthcoming) Google+ pages for business: lessons learned and tips

While waiting for Google+ business pages (and not only) to be officially open (after they let some brands get in, then blocked them, then re-opened again), I thought it was good to have a look at what happened with Facebook’s most famous fan pages.Especially since we all know this “social networks battle” is not just about social networks.

Also, after Facebook announced that some brands will have a dedicated offering to their fans, based on fans’ Klout scores, I thought it was good to have a look at klout scores too. I actually found something very interesting.

I started my analysis by finding the top 10 brands in a specific sector (I focused my attention on food and beverage) and started with gathering information about their Facebook fans, their twitter followers and their Klout score, since it seems these are the most used reference “numbers”. Interesting enough, while some Facebook fan pages gather over 10M fans, the relevance of their twitter followers and their Klout score seems totally not correlated.

After investigating on how they moved their social media steps, I found every brand has its own strategy and, while some of them have a complete integration between mobile apps, twitter and Facebook page (like, for example Starbucks does), some others stay definitely more simple.

But for a couple of them, the story on how their Facebook presence was created is really awesome: the Coca-Cola Facebook page was, in fact, created by 2 Coca-Cola fans from Los Angeles, who just went viral and got to page having over 3M fans in 2009. At that time, in 2009, they were contacted by Coca-Cola, who asked them to keep taking care of their page. And today, Coca-Cola ranks first in the top 10 brands on Facebook. Surely Coca-Cola had a very intelligent use of RFID – and not in their supply chain!- and a good partnership with Facebook. In fact, their Coca-Cola village 2010 experiment helped them gathering more fans. And Coca-Cola was the first to experiment RFID-enabled Likes for their page.

Definitely a great example of using the page for actually listening to the fans and spotting the best technology to get more visibility. They are also very active on their twitter, though their activity seems pretty much interacting directly with their followers. Good to have them feeling close to the brand.

Another fan page-  amongst the top 10 – created by a fan is the Nutella Facebook page. And interesting enough, the Nutella page is one of the most simple pages too! (I love the world map on the Facebook Info page, done with bread and Nutella, by the way).

So if your brand finds that you have a good number of fans on an unofficial page, think twice before asking Facebook to close that page (which is in your rights), especially if fans are well engaged and if the creators of that page give your brand a good reputation. Also, you may actually be saving some good $$.

Another interesting thing I found about the top ten pages, as anticipated at the beginning of this post, is that not all have a twitter presence (having worked mainly in Italy and only for a few months in the US, I am not really surprised the 2 products, both owned by an Italian brand, don’t also use twitter): I am referring to Ferrero Rocher and Nutella.

That’s not all. I found something even more interesting from this analysis. I am sure you all would think those pages with the majority of online interactions, integration of apps and twitter and with the most effective marketing on social media would translate – if not in an immediate revenue- at least in more visits on your corporate website, where maybe your talks can be more direct and more focusing on increasing your revenues. Wrong! Those pages with less interactions and links are those actually getting more traffic on their website  – at least according to compete – which tells you how your competitors are performing online. Data show website traffic trends for Ferrero (owner of both Nutella and Ferrero Rocher) and Coca-Cola for the past 12 months or so.

Ferrero’s website traffic increase seems more evident than Coca-Cola’s

What shall then brands do on Google+ to have winning strategies?

Surely, keep building brand reputation, increasing your clients and fans experience, letting them really interacting with the brand. Maybe suggesting contests and making your business page your hub for all your country-based marketing initiatives- If you are doing this on G+, you may likely be able to use google maps to point your audience to dedicated events (taking inspiration from the food trucks of famous New York restaurants), or use Circles to create dedicated messaging on upcoming events, promotions, and roadshows, or even use hangouts and let your fans use their own creativity to keep the ball rolling.

Facebook fan pages vs Google+ business pages:

Another good point to keep in mind is the different words used by the two companies to call their “branded” pages. Facebook, which is somehow more of a “vox populi” creation, and as Zuckerberg has pointed out, it’s all about leaving people a chance to create that 95% they want to add to what they give them, as reported in this article.Business pages on Facebook are called fan pages, and this sounds so nice and customer centric.

Google+ calls these pages “pages for business”.

Whatever you will do on G+, don’t forget to listen to what they have to tell you first. They may give you the right input to start your campaign.

Google+ vs Facebook: Is It Just About Social Network?

Taking advantage of the LinkedOut situation this morning (LinkedIn returned a 500 error), I managed to spend some time on Google+.

The move about having users being able to get on G+ only by invitation it’s surely been a nice marketing move. And the fact that LinkedIn was not working today, has been a fortunate coincidence. Let’s see now if G+ will work. I am curious to see if there has been any drop in Facebook traffic in these days, after G+ launched, or if there will be more drop in the US GDP once G+ will get bigger.

I still think one of the most interesting differentiating factors of G+ is “Circle+”. Interesting enough, it took less time to have an app (which also grants visibility to its source code) making Facebook have this same funcionality than it took to Google to open its doors to users.

Here are my initial thoughts about G+, summarized by section:

click to enlarge

G+ and Privacy: isn’t Google going to know too much about us?

[more about this can be found in this more recent post here]

We heard already about some concerns about privacy settings on Google. And I am sure we all remember about all the issues facebook went through during its 7 years, with regard to privacy.

As a start, here are the available Privacy settings on G+ as of today, 7/1/2011 (I am sure they will change them=:

Someone sees this Google move as a way to compete with Twitter, rather than with Facebook. Personally, I don’t see Google+ as a way to take either of the two (Twitter and Facebook) out of the Social Networks game.I see Google becoming more and more the owner of our data, our identity, and becoming the most powerful marketing weapon.

Surely, many of those who claim to be sick of Facebook – mainly because of the fact they don’t like their life to be so visible to their friends- will be happy they will have another option. But I am not sure those who tell they are sick of having others knowing so much about them will be happy to share even more.

Companies who turned their marketing dollars into Facebook will like this G+ even more than those who were hoping for a decline of Facebook.

Talking about marketing, I haven’t seen any ads (so far). I am sure the drop in banner clicks, as also reported in a recently published article, wasn’t a big surprise to Google, who knows basically everything about almost every website, if we consider the traffic that goes through its search engine, its emails, its analytics and its adwords, to mention a few. Surely we should not forget about other apps like docs and chats. Do they keep a copy of all our data?

Consider this: Google knows all banners performance for a huge number of companies, knows their website traffic, from and to inside pages and other websites. But what Google was missing, and why Google – IMHO- was keen to enter the social media market, is “who” was performing these actions, what are the habits of “clickers”, what is what today is called “digital body language”.

The social side of the equation was Google’s missing link for the ads battle. This is how Facebook started making the big bucks (I am referring to the deal with Microsoft). So now the game is not about Social Media – or at least not only. And I would expect some news to come up from Microsoft and its ads network.

What’s your opinion? Who is going to win this marketing battle?